Aw man, I hate ALL CAPS, but this thoughtful and thought-provoking article deserves it.
I fully and completely agree with every point. Thank you, Philip, for articulating what may be controversial points, but in fact are ones that should be debated and then embraced.
Well stated and I’ll be quoting you often (amidst edits to my ChatGPT-generated prose 😮)
I agree this is a very thoughtful approach to the ethical dilemma of AI in grant writing, but as a seasoned grant writer, I am concerned about the growing AI-gulf between savvy users and those of us traditionalists who are not early AI adopters. As a one-person office, it is hard enough to compete against the large R1s with their offices full of specialists and graphic designers churning out polished proposals on a daily basis - now I have to compete against computer AI bots as well. Time to retire!
THIS IS A MUST-READ!
Aw man, I hate ALL CAPS, but this thoughtful and thought-provoking article deserves it.
I fully and completely agree with every point. Thank you, Philip, for articulating what may be controversial points, but in fact are ones that should be debated and then embraced.
Well stated and I’ll be quoting you often (amidst edits to my ChatGPT-generated prose 😮)
I agree this is a very thoughtful approach to the ethical dilemma of AI in grant writing, but as a seasoned grant writer, I am concerned about the growing AI-gulf between savvy users and those of us traditionalists who are not early AI adopters. As a one-person office, it is hard enough to compete against the large R1s with their offices full of specialists and graphic designers churning out polished proposals on a daily basis - now I have to compete against computer AI bots as well. Time to retire!